Tea Party Agenda = Breach of Congressperson Oath of Office
Why would any Tea Party activist, supporter, or proponent in Congress choose Government shutdown and to not pay Government bills for existing obligations? Is the Tea Party movement not about fiscal responsibility, sound financial management, and reductions in Government debt, spending, the Federal Budget Deficit, and taxes?
Why would any Congressperson choose to risk further degradation of the U.S. credit rating and harm to our economy, future, and reputation? Have they not sworn an oath to the U.S. Constitution and to well and faithfully discharge the duties of their office?
GravitySailor’s Understanding of The Debt Limit
Apparently I am not alone in my confusion surrounding our now regular political battles over the United States debt ceiling (“Debt Limit”). There is no controversy over the meaning of Debt Limit, it is a legal restriction on the amount the United States Treasury (“Treasury”) may borrow (issue debt) to pay for existing obligations—similar to your credit card limit, but only Congress may raise it.
These existing obligations do not represent new spending, but simply the Government paying for services already received, promised, or owed. The Government incurs these obligations through normal operations, much the same as a business or household incurs expenses.
The U.S. Treasury Definition of Debt Limit
How The Government Borrows
The Government process of borrowing (issuing debt) to settle its obligations is analogous to an individual using a credit card to pay a utility bill. The utility service has already been received, and the consumer must pay the ensuing obligation within the previously agreed terms—typically 30 days. If you don’t have the cash available in your checking account, you can borrow money (credit card) to pay the utility and satisfy the obligation.
Of course, using your credit card creates a new obligation consisting of the principal and interest now owed on your debt to the credit card company. In this example you have realized the idiom or proverb of “borrowing from Peter to pay Paul;” where your net obligation is not reduced, but the creditor is now the credit card company (Peter) as opposed to the utility (Paul), and the amount due accrues interest until paid—in accordance with the terms you have previously agreed to with your credit card company (Peter.)
Using a credit card to pay current and ongoing expenses is a temporary solution to a shortfall that requires fundamental financial management and structural change. The shortfall problem has not been solved, the solution simply delayed, often drawing another idiom, “kicking the can down the road.”
A 30-Year View of The Public Debt
As you can see in the following chart, the U.S. Public debt Ceiling has continued to rise dramatically over the past 30 years, although not so much during the Clinton administration, and quite steeply through the George W. Bush and Obama years.
Media Misinformation About The Debt Limit
My confusion begins with all the noise in the media that some Conservatives in Congress wish to prevent any increase in the debt limit, which will neither be appreciated by the Citizenry relying on Government payments (Social Security, Medicare, military salaries) nor creditors (including Sovereign states) that have loaned the United States money in good faith, expecting repayment of interest and principal according to agreed terms. Is this where our divisiveness has taken us? A willingness by elected officials to knowingly and intentionally jeopardize the creditworthiness of our country?
HYPOCRISY = The practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one’s own behavior does not conform.
So why would any Conservative Congressperson ever feel that damaging the country’s credit rating is sound? Why would any responsible Conservative, so committed to Capitalism, free markets, the Rule of Law, The Constitution, and sound business practices; believe that default on our existing legal obligations is appropriate in any situation? Why would any Conservative capitulate to the Tea Party’s desire to defund the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or burn down the government?
It’s time to call things for what they really are, Hypocrisy of the highest order. There simply is no rational reason for this reckless conduct, other than a willingness to stop at nothing to oppose the President.
To those ideologue anti-government legislators who are willing to default on our Government’s existing legal obligations—SHAME ON YOU! You are apparently willing to sacrifice your honor, integrity, and oath of office in a desperate attempt to obstruct President Obama’s progress.
Congressperson Oath of Office
Select Clauses from Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution
- The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States
- To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
- To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations,
- To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Specific Breaches of Congressional Oath:
- Intentionally defaulting on existing United States legal obligations is clearly NOT “well and faithfully discharging the duties of the office.”
- Intentionally tarnishing the United States credit rating is clearly NOT “well and faithfully discharging the duties of the office.”
- Intentionally tarnishing the United States credit rating is clearly NOT “regulating commerce with foreign nations,” unless by regulate the Founding Fathers meant sabotage!
- Intentionally defaulting on existing United States Treasury Bills–purchased by foreign countries, is clearly NOT “regulating commerce with foreign nations.”
- Shutting down the Government is NOT, “supporting and defending…and bearing true faith and allegiance…to the Constitution.”
Supporting the Constitution means supporting all current laws under the Constitution, and that includes the ACA that has passed SCOTUS muster.
Mark G Capolupo